Published On: October 18th, 2015|

Education Next – Matt Barnum

“In a series of blog posts (I, II, III, IV), Jay Greene argues against the “high-regulation approach” to school choice. I’m going to focus on the final two posts, in which Greene argues that student achievement tests are poor proxies for school quality and that they’re not correlated with other measures of quality. I think Greene is right to a large extent. But he undersells the value of tests. It’s pretty clear that the ability of a school or teacher to increase students’ standardized test scores is associated with long-run outcomes. Let’s dig in to some evidence:.”(more)